Friday, December 19, 2025
Home Blog Page 1954

Worthy Cause: Doris Day Auctions Rare Calendars to Raise Money for Animal Foundation

2

Our hero and pal Doris Day is having a special auction this week on ebay to raise money for her animal foundation. The ever youthful Doris, a magnificent legend who lives in paradise– Carmel, California– is relentless in helping the animal world. She’s auctioning off just a few rare signed 2013 calendars on ebay at http://tinyurl.com/cad4hxb

You can also see a video from all of Doris’s celebrity friends at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bk76Bcw9CFI

Doris keeps raising money and doing good deeds at www.dorisday.com, where you can donate to her foundation and buy a copy of her new album, My Heart. You can also hear an audio message from Doris for the holidays.

Last winter I had the honor of interviewing Doris for Parade magazine. She hadn’t done a full interview in about 20 years. I hope we can do more soon. Here are the links:

http://www.showbiz411.com/2011/12/12/how-doris-day-almost-didnt-let-paul-mccartney-interview-her

http://www.parade.com/celebrity/celebrity-parade/2011/12/doris-day.html

Donate to the Doris Day Animal Foundation before the end of 2012– and let’s hope Doris gets an honorary Academy Award this coming year. It’s been a long time coming.

 

 

UPDATE: Tom Cruise Has Lowest Opening Weekend Box Office Just About Ever

10

UPDATE: With the exception of the oddity called “Lions for Lambs,”  Tom Cruise has never had a lower opening weekend box office than with “Jack Reacher.” I’m counting here his movies that opened in more than 2,000 theatres. “Reacher”  took in just $15.6 million. That’s actually less than each of Cruise’s last two films, “Knight and Day” and “Valkyrie,” which were in similar size releases and– in the case of the lamentable “Valkyrie”– at Christmas as well. Those two releases opened in the $20 mil range.

You have to go back 20 years to “Far and Away” to find a Cruise opening weekend that made less money–$10 mil, only 1800 theaters. Is this a referendum for Cruise in non Mission Impossible vehicles? It’s definitely a wake up call. As I’ve said for years, his best shot at regaining a larger audience is to find a new “Jerry Maguire” role where he can woo the female audience with his infectious grin. He’s also going to have to get real with promotion– actual interviews, with real answers to questions. And maybe he’ll get the message that Scientology has helped destroy three marriages, and now, possibly, it imperils his career.

Earlier: The confluence of many things, starting with the Newtown, Connecticut killings and ending with Tom Cruise’s aversion to doing much personal publicity, has ended with a disappointing opening night for “Jack Reacher.” Playing in over 3,300 theaters, “Reacher” made only $5.1 million on Friday night.

That’s considerably less–a million dollars or so — than “Knight and Day” made in 2010 on its first Friday night. That movie went on to make just around $78 million.

Of course, the producers of “Jack Reacher” say it only cost $60 million. That’s ridiculous since Cruise gets $20 million off the top. And they spent a lot on international premieres, and canceled junkets. No matter– “Jack Reacher” didn’t cost just $40 million other than Cruise’s salary.

“Reacher” is a key referendum on Tom Cruise outside of “Mission Impossible” franchise. If it makes $15 million or less this weekend, that’s not a good sign. “Reacher” has been clobbered by the main critics. It’s also up against “The Hobbit”–which made twice as much money last night– as well as lingering and popular films like “Skyfall” and “Lincoln.” If a new Tom Cruise isn’t making much of a dent in the box office, that’s not good news.

Tomorrow we’ll see how the whole thing played out.

PS Good news: what no one’s talking about is that Ang Lee’s “Life of Pi” has quietly cruised to $73 million very quickly. How nice! I thought this Pi might have been undercooked, but it’s not so. Could very well be a Best Picture nominee, along with Lincoln, Argo, Silver Linings, Django, Best Exotic Marigold Hotel, Les Miz, The Master, Beasts of the Southern Wild, and –hmmm– Amour?

thanks to Boxofficemojo.com:

Date Title (click to view) Studio Lifetime Gross / Theaters Opening / Theaters Rank
12/21/12 Jack Reacher Par. $15,600,000 3,352 $15,600,000 3,352 30
6/15/12 Rock of Ages WB (NL) $38,518,613 3,470 $14,437,269 3,470 25
12/16/11 Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol Par. $209,397,903 3,555 $12,785,204 425 3
6/23/10 Knight & Day Fox $76,423,035 3,104 $20,139,985 3,098 19
12/25/08 Valkyrie UA $83,077,833 2,838 $21,027,007 2,711 16
8/13/08 Tropic Thunder P/DW $110,515,313 3,473 $25,812,796 3,319
11/9/07 Lions for Lambs UA $15,002,854 2,216 $6,702,434 2,215 32
5/5/06 Mission: Impossible III Par. $134,029,801 4,059 $47,743,273 4,054 10
6/29/05 War of the Worlds Par. $234,280,354 3,910 $64,878,725 3,908 1
8/6/04 Collateral DW $101,005,703 3,205 $24,701,458 3,188 14
12/5/03 The Last Samurai WB $111,127,263 2,938 $24,271,354 2,908 12
7/26/02 Austin Powers in Goldmember
(Cameo)
NL $213,307,889 3,613 $73,071,188 3,613
6/21/02 Minority Report Fox $132,072,926 3,001 $35,677,125 3,001 11
4/19/02 Space Station 3-D (IMAX)
(Narrator)
Imax $86,738,386 64 $489,488 24
12/14/01 Vanilla Sky Par. $100,618,344 2,842 $25,015,518 2,742 15
5/24/00 Mission: Impossible II Par. $215,409,889 3,669 $57,845,297 3,653 2
12/17/99 Magnolia NL $22,455,976 1,086 $193,604 7 28
7/16/99 Eyes Wide Shut WB $55,691,208 2,483 $21,706,163 2,411 23
12/13/96 Jerry Maguire Sony $153,952,592 2,531 $17,084,296 2,531 8
5/22/96 Mission: Impossible Par. $180,981,856 3,012 $45,436,830 3,012 4
11/11/94 Interview with the Vampire WB $105,264,608 2,604 $36,389,705 2,604 13
7/2/93 The Firm Par. $158,348,367 2,393 $25,400,000 2,393 7
12/11/92 A Few Good Men Col. $141,340,178 2,201 $15,517,468 1,925 9
5/22/92 Far and Away Uni. $58,883,840 1,885 $10,194,520 1,583 22
6/29/90 Days of Thunder

 

Oscars: Older Members are Concerned About Online Voting

1

Older members of the motion picture academy are worried about online voting. I spoke to several today at lunch, mostly about which movies they liked etc in my continuing unofficial poll. More on that in a minute. I got a lot of responses about the new online voting, which isn’t difficult and should be a breeze for voters under 60.

But what about the great number of Academy members over 60? In my own life, I know plenty of people 80 and older who use the internet every day and don’t think twice about it. My pal Freddie Ross Hancock, who started BAFTA in the United States and can do just about anything, is a computer whiz.  My mom (who is not yet 80 and refers to DVR as “taping”) loves her desktop, laptop and iPhone.

What I’ve learned recently is that a lot of people who you’d think could do it are very concerned about screwing it up. One actor said to me today: “I’m less worried about who or what I am voting for than the actually voting. The BAFTA ballot is really making me nervous.”

No one wants to make a mistake. A lot of people told me they will use requested paper ballots. I do think the Academy will be getting a lot of Help Requests from members in the next week. Change isn’t easy.

Meantime, my completely strawish poll moves on with a show of hands and basic anecdotes. Sometimes older Academy members like or dislike a movie or performance because it triggers a memory. It’s not often but it’s always interesting. A lot of them remember Frederic March in the original non musical movie of “Les Miserables.” Now they can’t get the songs out of their heads from Tom Hooper’s musical movie. No one has mentioned “too many closeups.” No one. They love the actors, and the songs. Almost all have made it to theatre screenings instead of watching DVDs at home.

“Lincoln” is proving very interesting. East coasters love it. The West coasters dig DDL and Sally Field, always mention Tommy Lee Jones. But they are not excited about the movie itself. Lincoln, of course, never had to raise money in Hollywood.

Today I heard a lot about “The Life of Pi.” When they’ve seen it, they’ve loved it. I heard “Masterpiece” a couple of times.  A new name came up a lot today: Naomi Watts from “The Impossible.” She has a good shot at rounding out the Best Actress list. Joaquin Phoenix’s name is mentioned too. But he should know that Academy members are aware Phoenix bashed the Oscars in an interview– which appeared in print, of course.

Rare Statement: The CIA Says Bigelow Film “Not Realistic Portrayal”

49

The Central Intelligence Agency has issued a statement about Kathryn Bigelow’s film “Zero Dark Thirty.” This must be a first. I can’t remember a time the austere CIA said anything about a Hollywood film. But they are not happy. Of course this will probably create more interest in Bigelow’s film about the hunt for and killing of Osama Bin Laden.

Acting Director Michael Morell’s statement follows. He also calls the deceased crazed killer “Usama.” We like “Osama.” (Tomato, Tomatto, let’s call the whole thing off!)

Statement:

:I would not normally comment on a Hollywood film, but I think it important to put Zero Dark Thirty, which deals with one of the most significant achievements in our history, into some context.  The film, which premiered this week, addresses the successful hunt for Usama Bin Ladin that was the focus of incredibly dedicated men and women across our Agency, Intelligence Community, and military partners for many years.  But in doing so, the film takes significant artistic license, while portraying itself as being historically accurate.

What I want you to know is that Zero Dark Thirty is a dramatization, not a realistic portrayal of the facts.  CIA interacted with the filmmakers through our Office of Public Affairs but, as is true with any entertainment project with which we interact, we do not control the final product.

It would not be practical for me to walk through all the fiction in the film, but let me highlight a few aspects that particularly underscore the extent to which the film departs from reality.

  • First, the hunt for Usama Bin Ladin was a decade-long effort that depended on the selfless commitment of hundreds of officers.  The filmmakers attributed the actions of our entire Agency—and the broader Intelligence Community—to just a few individuals.  This may make for more compelling entertainment, but it does not reflect the facts.  The success of the May 1st 2011 operation was a team effort—and a very large team at that.
  • Second, the film creates the strong impression that the enhanced interrogation techniques that were part of our former detention and interrogation program were the key to finding Bin Ladin.  That impression is false.  As we have said before, the truth is that multiple streams of intelligence led CIA analysts to conclude that Bin Ladin was hiding in Abbottabad.  Some came from detainees subjected to enhanced techniques, but there were many other sources as well.  And, importantly, whether enhanced interrogation techniques were the only timely and effective way to obtain information from those detainees, as the film suggests, is a matter of debate that cannot and never will be definitively resolved.
  • Third, the film takes considerable liberties in its depiction of CIA personnel and their actions, including some who died while serving our country.  We cannot allow a Hollywood film to cloud our memory of them.

Commentators will have much to say about this film in the weeks ahead.  Through it all, I want you to remember that Zero Dark Thirty is not a documentary.  What you should also remember is that the Bin Ladin operation was a landmark achievement by our country, by our military, by our Intelligence Community, and by our Agency.

Michael Morell

Jack Black: “School of Rock” will be on my Tombstone

0

Jack Black, one of the nice guys, was toasted at a reception last night at the Four Seasons in BeverlyHills for his comedy, “Bernie,” nominated for a Critics Choice Award. Two headlines–first, I asked Jack about “School of Rock,” his classic film that never had a sequel. He told me: “I have to be careful about that. We’d need a great script. That movie will be on my tombstone, so a sequel would have to be amazing.”

Second: among the guests were many Academy voters including Bud Cort, best known forever as the star of “Harold and Maude.” Cort brought Jack a terrific Christmas gift: the largest ever Whitman’s Sampler of candy anyone has ever seen. “We could try them now!” Jack exclaimed, but of course there was already plenty of food including many mouth watering desserts. The Whitman’s Sampler is headed to the Black family home.

Meantime, the reception was chockablock with interesting people we only get to see during Oscar season. Among them was Piper Laurie, Terry Moore (once the girlfriend of Howard Hughes, and looking now like several million bucks), our pal Robert Forster, plus Brad Douriff, Michael Nouri, Francine York (who count the old Batman TV show in her credits), Margaret Blye, and Tommy Cook.

Some names you may not know, but the Academy is almost 6000 strong. The largest segment is actors. And the majority of them are older, and not completely famous, but hard working veterans who’ve been in Hollywood a long time.

So what do they like? I took some unofficial polls last night, asking people to give one word responses to the names of films and actors. Some observations: everyone loves Jennifer Lawrence, Daniel Day Lewis, Hugh Jackman, Anne Hathaway. Bradley Cooper has a big fan base.

Some people think “Lincoln” is dull during its first hour. “Les Miz” is a hit in every category. “Zero Dark Thirty” –everyone objected to the waterboarding scene, which was interesting. “Django” got high marks. So did “Beasts of the Southern Wild.” The whole group like “Argo” but no particular actor in it. Denzel Washington in “Flight” has a lot of support but he needs more of a push.

What works? Meeting cast, directors, etc.

More to come…

Astonishing: Jane Fonda Turns A Hot, Sexy Smart 75 Years Young

5

December 21st: I do believe the world is supposed to end today. Also, it’s the winter solstice. And Jane Fonda, the two time winner of the Academy Award, the great American actress after Katharine Hepburn and before Meryl Streep (and who gave us Meryl Streep in “Julia”), mother, grandmother, sister, activist, speaker of her mind, visionary, writer, and friend turns 75 years younger today. God bless her.

There have been books written about her, and she’s given us a full length memoir. Years and years ago, DA Pennebaker shot an entire documentary about her. For the smart people, she’s a hero–Jane Fonda gave voice to a generation when she was just finding her own, and enabled us to ask important questions of our government when it wasn’t fashionable, when it was dangerous, and when she had everything to lose after winning an Oscar for “Klute.”

After all she was also the daughter of a beloved movie star; she was Hollywood royalty. But she’d repositioned herself from sex kitten to thoughtful advocate. And she completely represented how the Sixties of pillbox hats and the Twist became the early Seventies of protests and ultimatums.

If your head remains buried in the sand, she’s still Hanoi Jane sitting on that tank. Please. She’s apologized over and over. The internet is still full of fictional tales about so called treasonous acts– all made up, well documented fantasies. Mistakes were made, yes, she’s the first to admit them. But we have to appreciate it when someone who has a lot to lose leverages their world to make a difference in ours. Fewer people do that every day.

Her GCAPP (Georgia Campaign for Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention) foundation in Atlanta has helped thousands of teenage girls. Her work out books, tapes, and DVDs have always been cutting edge primers for mental and physical health.

None of this is accomplished without amazing focus, tenacity, and sheer brilliance. And it hasn’t been easy: her mother committed suicide. Her father was distant and difficult. She could have coasted, and taken life easy. She committed herseld instead to having the fullest life, mistakes and all, lived out in the open, come hell or high water.

It’s not over by a long shot. Seventy five? Jane Fonda does not retire. She’s got movies, and plays, and projects. She’s just been around the world promoting more workout DVDs. When she goes to the Cannes Film Festival–as she did in 2011–she steals the show from all the ingenues. Hot, sexy and smart at 75, that’s Jane Fonda, without hesitation.

The Oscars were for “Klute” and “Coming Home.” But in the 70s Jane took control of her career. Now every actress has a production company. Then, only Jane Fonda did. “Julia,” “The China Syndrome,” “On Golden Pond,” “9 to 5,” not to forget “The Morning After,” “The Electric Horseman,” “Comes a Horseman”– what a run. Even when  film didn’t quite work, like “Stanley and Iris” with Robert DeNiro, you could see the intentions were good.

The quintessential Jane Fonda film shows the main character on a learning curve. She starts with an established idea, or ethic, that is perfectly reasonable. Lots of people could live like the characters as we first meet them. But then everything is quesitoned, slowly, like an onion being peeled. And Fonda’s heroines learn something new. And we learn with them– even if it’s funny, as with “9 to 5” when Judy Bernly gradually realizes what her life could be.

Jane saw a long time ago what her life could be. I think she’s basically an optimist, which is sort of amazing. How does a person become that after everything that’s happened to her? Yesterday she wrote on her blog:

“When I was young–up till my 50s–I was sure that if I lived this long I’d be miserable, decrepit, ugly and alone.

Instead, I’m happier than ever, more at peace, healthy–well, there are times when my body hurts all because I have osteoarthritis. But that doesn’t define me. I’m basically healthy and have loving, intelligent, challenging children, grandchildren, friends and lover. I feel very blessed. I also know that this didn’t just happen, I’ve worked hard (and continue to) for this to be so.

I will turn 75 tomorrow, Friday 12/21/12, the day that the Mayans and others predicted a many-thousands-of-years-old era would come to an end. There are those who interpret this prediction as End of Days. I feel—as do many others–that it will, instead, mark an awakening, a new beginning.”

Really, no kidding, words to live by.

 

 

 

 

Tom Cruise “Jack Reacher” Clobbered By Major Critics

3

The avalanche of bad reviews for Tom Cruise in “Jack Reacher” has begun. The film maintained an 80 rating on rottentomatoes.com mostly from bloggers and junketeers. But now the big guns are coming in, and “Reacher” has slipped to 66%. It may go lower as a few more reviews trickle in. (The review in the NY Times is especially bad. Ouch!)

Third update: Down to 59%. Ann Hornaday of the Washington Post says: “A wildly ill-advised miscalculation.”

UPDATE Friday 12-21-12: it’s down to 63%. Second update: down to 61%.

“Reacher” is hobbled by circumstances beyond its control. It’s vigilante movie that begins with a sniper picking off five people including a nanny with a small child. In light of the tragedy in Connecticut, this will be a massive deterrent. Even gung ho young men may not want to see this right now.

I have not seen “Reacher” due to scheduling. I will try and see it this weekend. My colleague Leah Sydney blanched at the unfortunate connection to news events at her screening. It’s hard to evaluate this kind of film in light of current events.

No matter what anyone says, Tom Cruise did as little as possible to promote “Reacher” because of his personal problems. Even though the tabloid supermarket weeklies have him “reuniting” with Katie Holmes, this is fiction. Amusing, but fiction.

“Reacher” is a test for Cruise, who hasn’t had a real non “Mission Impossible” hit in years. “Knight and Day” was a dud, and “Valkyrie” was a calamity. Cruise is trying to reinvent himself, but it’s unclear what his constituency is after seven years of tabloid fodder concerning Holmes and Scientology, couch jumping and the like.

The other test is for “Reacher” writer director Christopher McQuarrie, whom Crusie wants for “Mission Impossible 5.” McQuarrie told this site’s Paula Schwartz that he’s been chosen but can’t discuss it yet. It may be Paramount will wait and see how “Reacher” does before giving McQuarrie such a big project. Stay tuned…

Bin Laden Biz at Box Office, Streisand Nothing to Be Guilty Of

3

Box office from Wednesday: Barbra Streisand once sang she had nothing to be guilty of, and that’s still true. “The Guilt Trip,” a mild comedy with Seth Rogen, did fine on its opening day. In wide release “The Guilt Trip” did over $1 million, and finished second to “The Hobbit.” No one ever thought the comedy about a mother son road trip would be doing “Skyfall” like numbers.

As the season progresses, “The Guilt Trip” should skew older and find a nice audience among those who don’t want to see snipers (“Jack Reacher”), insane comic  violence (“Django Unchained”), or waterboarding (“Zero Dark Thirty”).

Meantime, the lure of waterboarding–not water skiing or surfboarding– and lots of nutty criticism fueled the first day for Kathryn Bigelow’s “Zero Dark Thirty.” It made $125,000 on 5 screens. That’s very strong but not the bonanza discussed elsewhere. I’m rooting for this film because it’s so well made, not because of its faux controversies.

Otherwise, Oscar balloting continues apace and so does the campaigning and celebrating. On Tuesday, Vanity Fair editor Graydon Carter hosted a classy lunch at his Monkey Bar for Richard Gere, a Golden Globe nominee for Best Actor in “Arbitrage.” Director Nick Jarecki was there, so was Mrs Gere aka Carey Lowell, and plenty of society types and celebs. Carter makes a cameo in the very clever film produced by Laura Bickford. “Arbitrage” is ‘the little movie that could’. It’s had a decent box office run worldwide, and excellent on demand video sales. It’s well crafted, with solid stars like Gere and Susan Sarandon. Bravo!

Last night there was a reception for Robert DeNiro and “Silver Linings Playbook,” the sleeper film of the season and the one most people I talk to say they “loved” unequivocally. This film has a little less press because its main players, Bradley Cooper and Jennifer Lawrence, are shooting films right now. But don’t worry–this beauty of a dramedy is making a big impact with Academy voters. It may surprise everyone.

On the plane out to Los Angeles today, I went on YouTube and watched all the versions of the “Les Miz” songs from the past, including the essential and marvelous Lea Salonga. I must say the movie versions hold their own nicely, surprisingly. All the praise for Hugh Jackman, Anne Hathaway, and Eddie Redmayne, among others, is deserved. I think when “Les Miz” finally is seen by regular audiences, people are going to go nuts for it.

 

Jon Hamm Gets Ready For a Big Time Movie Star Career

0

Jon Hamm has made his move. The award winning star of “Mad Men” has signed with Creative Artists Agency after his long time talent agent, Carol Bodie, was dropped from ICM Partners. In a change that will sting for a long time, Hamm “ankled” ICM yesterday for CAA. Now that he’s filming the penultimate season of “Mad Men,” Hamm has got to make preparations for his big screen movie career. And trust me, he will have one. If anyone in a TV series was set for movie stardom, it’s Hamm. He’s already done a ton of extra curricular work to get ready, from movies like “The Town” to constant work with “30 Rock,” “Saturday Night Live,” Tina Fey, and Kristen Wiig. In the last year, Hamm co-starred in girlfriend Jennifer Westfeldt’s terrific comedy, “Friends with Kids.” He recently finished playing Larry David’s nemesis in David’s HBO movie, as well. By the time “Mad Men” finishes in 2014, Hamm will have made a smooth transition from Don Draper to work as a leading man.

Watch Michael Moore’s “Bowling for Columbine” Anti-Gun Movie Here For Free

0

“Bowling for Columbine,” the anti-gun documentary that put Michael Moore on the map for good, has been posted all over the internet for free. Moore has placed it on YouTube, with NetFlix and on Current TV’s website for free so anyone can see it. In light of the Newtown, Connecticut tragedy. “Bowling for Columbine” comes off as more prescient and genius like than ever before.

The film can be seen in its entirety in our video player at the bottom of our home page. Also, here’s the YouTube link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=fAouWXzi-1Q

“Bowling for Columbine” won the Academy Award, the Broadcast Critics Award, the 55th anniversary prize at the Cannes Film Festival, and ever other award except the Golden Globe in 2002-2003.

Also, if you’re in Traverse City, Michigan on Thursday. Moore and wife Kathleen Glynn are screening “Bowling for Columbine” for free at 6:30pm at the State Theater.

Meantime. Moore writes on his website, www.michaelmoore.com:

“I am truly beside myself this time. I tried to ring a warning bell about this a decade ago. The disease has only gotten worse.

But…you feel something different in the air across America tonight, don’t you? People have had it and the outrage is loud and visible. I’m convinced the majority of Americans will now back strong gun control laws. And a better mental health care system. And perhaps a few are willing to look at the deeper issue of how this country officially sanctions violence as a means to an end.

The NRA, for the first time ever, has gone silent. They’ve taken their Facebook page down. They know they can’t show up in Newtown next week and stick it to the people there, like they usually do after one of these mass killings. Let’s face it, the gun lobby tonight is on the ropes. Now is the time to act. We can’t let this sad moment pass without a true response and a president willing to be a strong leader.

I’ll send some more thoughts tomorrow, but for now I thought I’d share with you what I’ve been sending out over Twitter this weekend. (If you’re not on Twitter, please consider it. I know – not one more social media stop, please! But I’ve found it to be a quick and easy way to communicate with millions. Please give it a try. I send things out on it every day and I’d like you not to miss them.)”