Friday, December 19, 2025
Home Blog Page 1817

“Entourage” The Movie Is a Go: And Here’s the Original Story

0

Gosh– to think I broke the news about an “Entourage” movie waaay back on December 3, 2009! And now finally the deals are done, and the big screen version of HBO’s popular comedy will be made starting this January. Let’s hope it’s supercharged and a lot of fun, and not incredibly misogynist or a big part of the audience will not show up. At least, unlike “Sex and the City,” there won’t be over the top consumerism.

Here’s the original link:

http://www.showbiz411.com/2009/12/03/20091203wahlberg-entourage-lovely-bones

 

 

Nicole Kidman on Tom Cruise vs Husband Keith Urban: “I’ve Met My Great Love Now”

1

Nicole Kidman is on the cover of Vanity Fair and gives them a great interview. The big pull quote: “And you know, with no disrespect to what I had with Tom, I’ve met my great love now. And I really did not know if that was going to happen. I wanted it, but I didn’t want it for a while, because I didn’t want to jump from one relationship to another. I had a lot of time alone, which was really, really good, because I was a child, really, when I got married. And I needed to grow up.”

No disrespect, but that’s Nicole: honest and forthright. Good for her. She and Keith Urban seem like an exceptionally happy couple to me, proud parents of two beautiful little girls. Urban is one of the good guys, as normal as a rock star can be, and incredibly talented. She tells writer Sam Kashner: “My husband and I are in uncharted territory because we’re trying to find artistic expression but also we’re incredibly connected as a family—we’re very, very tight, very, very close, and I have a very, very primal protection of my family.”

The Vanity Fair interview was timed to the release of “Grace of Monaco.” The movie has since been moved to 2014. These things happen. But frankly, Nicole for any reason is welcome!

 

Apple Invades New Holocaust Film with Jarring iMac Product Placement

3

It’s a bit of a shock, but probably not so much to regular movie goers. Toward the end of Brian Percival’s adaptation of “The Book Thief,” there’s a jarring image. The camera sweeps over a group of framed family photos on a piano with vistas of Central Park West just beyond. The pictures are of people we’ve seen in the long period piece of a movie: the main character, her family, Holocaust survivors and victims.

And there, among the misty memories, is a sleek new iMac computer.

The black and silver of the computer, with the Apple logo, shine in the gauzy afternoon sun as the audience is asked to recall, sentimentally, all these people who suffered horrors at the hands of the Nazis.

Yes, I do believe it’s a 17″ inch screen. I didn’t get a chance to check the model and serial numbers. But I was thinking, as “The Book Thief” came to an end, I am ready for an upgrade.

Wipe away those tears.  Apple has turned “The Book Thief” into iHolocaust.

The meaning of this is clear: Apple has paid a handsome amount for a prominent product placement. “The Book Thief” runs at least two hours, and for most of that time it takes place in Germany from 1940 to 1945. Based on the bestselling novel, it tells the implausible story of how a 12 girl survives the deaths of everyone around her.

In the last few minutes–this isn’t a spoiler since 10 million people have read the book–we learn that she became a great writer with a magnificent Fifth Avenue apartment. And placed prominently in that apartment is one well known high tech piece of equipment: an Apple computer.

Lots of movies have product placements. They are obvious. Papa John’s pizza, regularly sneaked into movies, is all over Ben Stiller’s “The Secret Life of Walter Mitty.” Apple and Dell are frequently seen logos on laptops that turn up in TV series and movies. But they’re usually in context of someone using a laptop. In certain kinds of projects, the product placement is begrudgingly accepted. In so-called serious movies, however, this is a no no.

In the case of “The Book Thief,” there is no context. The black and silver Apple logo is just dropped in. The iMac is like a spaceship among lavender and lace. Did I mention that the owner of this iMac was 90 years old? A manual Underwood typewriter might have been more believable as a prop. Or some lovely pens.

I rather doubt director Percival was trying to convey the message that a new iMac is the reward for surviving the Holocaust. But the crassness just explodes, especially at the end of a movie that requires total suspension of disbelief in order to buy the story.

I was just thinking, How would they have handled this in “The Reader”? Could Ralph Fiennes’s son have recounted the trial of  Kate Winslet while showing pictures on his iPhone? Maybe in a revised “Schindler’s List” Oskar Schindler’s grandson could have listened to interviews with survivors on an iTouch. Even better: in “12 Years a Slave” Solomon Northrup’s great great daughter could have done research about his experiences on the iPad mini. Or better yet, asked Siri for advice.

 

Producer: John Belushi Movie with Emile Hirsch Will Be Actor’s “Raging Bull”

0

Yes, a new movie about John Belushi is coming. It is not a remake of “Wired” which starred a young Michael Chiklis as a bloated out of control, beer can smashing in the head drug addict. Rather, “Belushi,” written and directed by Steve Conrad, is meant to be more like “Lenny.”

So who will play Belushi? Jonah Hill? Someone thought of as having girth? No. Producer Bonnie Timmerman, who’s always associated with quality projects, is very high on actor Emile Hirsch playing Belushi. I was surprised. Hirsch is slight and short, not nearly measuring up to Belushi’s heft and pudginess. But Timmerman, who is also a top tier casting director, assured me: “This will be his Raging Bull. He will gain some weight. But we’re going for the look someone obese. This is a different kind of Belushi movie, about his genius.”

Dan Aykroyd is signing on as an executive producer, as is Belushi’s widow, Judy Pisano. The movie is based on Pisano’s 2005 memoir. Once Hirsch’s deal is closed (it’s not quite done yet, there’s no contract, but it’s almost there), producers will look for a young Aykroyd and a young Pisano. It’s unclear how many of the original Not for Prime Time Players will be depicted, or Lorne Michaels, for that matter.

PS Here’s a scary thought: John Belushi– who died in 1982 at age 33– would be 64 if he were alive.

Michael Jackson: Joe Jackson Documentary in Limbo “Distributors Despised Him”

6

As Conrad Murray is released from jail today, we thought we’d catch up and find out what ever happened to the memoir and documentary about Joseph Jackson, Michael’s father. There were several announcements in the past about the two projects, called “The Architect,” which were going to explain how the elder Jackson wrought what he did.

According to a former producer on the documentary, George Paige, the documentary is now called “Making Michael.” Paige got out of the project a while ago, he told me, when it became clear that no distributor wanted it. “It’s all told from Joe Jackson’s perspective, and no one was interested. The distributors despised him [when they saw the film].”

Paige says the filmmakers needed $750,000 to finish the film and there was no way to come up with it. “It went back to the original investors, whoever they were.”

The guiding light behind the film, Johnny West, says “Making Michael” will be released “sometime after the first of the year.” He says has a distributor, but doesn’t want to announce who they are yet. West also told me there might be interest from the South by Southwest Film Festival.

In the doc, Paige recalled, Jackson senior reiterated that he and his family felt there was a “conspiracy” to kill Michael. Other than that, “it’s a clip job,” said. West confirmed that none of Michael Jackson’s music is in the film.

Neither of them knew anything about the status of the book called “The Architect,” announced two years ago with Atria/Simon & Schuster. The book isn’t listed anywhere. The editor from Atria has not returned calls. We’ll wait for an update.

 

Lou Reed At 1986 Amnesty International Concert: Only Wanted to Meet Jimmy Breslin (Exclusive Video)

0

Martin Lewis has sent this video of Lou Reed, from 1986 at Giants Stadium “Conspiracy of Hope” concert for Amnesty International. Martin says that he was introduced to Lou, the only person the the rocker wanted to meet was New York Daily News columnist Jimmy Breslin. “Everyone else wanted to cozy up to the movie stars. Lou was only interested in meeting Jimmy!”

Also: Ann Burroughs, chair of the Board of Directors, Amnesty International USA, made the following comments today about the death of artist Lou Reed:

“With the sad passing of Lou Reed, the human rights movement has lost a powerful voice for humanity and a strong ally in the defense of freedom and justice. Just as he inspired generations of rock fans with his indelible songs, he was also a passionate proponent for our cause. At his core, he bridled against repression in all its forms and he inspired others to speak up to protect human rights. One of his many admirers was the late Czech President and human rights activist Vaclav Havel, who famously smuggled a Velvet Underground album out of New York in the late 1960s.  The two men later became friends.   In 1986, Lou Reed joined with other leading musicians for the first of Amnesty International’s “Human Rights Concerts” series – performing at all six concerts on the “A Conspiracy Of Hope” U.S. tour. Recently, he very generously supported the release of his historic performances as part of Amnesty’s DVD box-set of those concerts.  We send our deep condolences to his loved ones.  He will be greatly missed by the human rights movement that he so strongly and eloquently supported.”

 

Mariah Carey Releases Cover Art for New Single: This is 43!

5

“The Art of Letting Go”: I don’t know what she let go. The single comes out next Tuesday November 11th.

mariah.cover.art

Oscars 2014: The Top Ten and a Couple More as of This Morning

0

Oscar race update: now that things are getting clearer, where are we? “The Monuments Men” and “Foxcatcher” are out of the race. “The Wolf of Wall Street” is back in, but no one’s seen it. “American Hustle” is probably in it, but no one’s seen that either. And as I’ve said before, “American Hustle” is unlikely as a Best Picture winner simply because “Argo” just won, and was a 70s true life “caper” movie. Two in a row? I don’t think so. But that doesn’t mean “AH” won’t be great.

And I am leaving “Rush” on the list. It would be a shame to ignore this film because of weak box office. Ron Howard did a superlative job. Daniel Bruhl deserves a Best Supporting Actor nod. Remember: films that win critics awards don’t repeat with the Academy. And “Gravity” has now made so much money, and will make so much more, that it could be the “Avatar” of 2014.

So where are we? Of the movies that have been seen, these are the top choices, in loose order:

1. 12 Years a Slave

2. Gravity

3. Lee Daniels’ The Butler

4. August: Osage County

5. Captain Phillips

6. Nebraska

7. Inside Llewyn Davis

8. Fruitvale Station

9. Blue Jasmine

10. Philomena

11. Mandela

12. Dallas Buyers Club

13. The Book Thief

14. All is Lost

15. Saving Mr. Banks

16. Rush

 

“Gravity” Passing $200Mil Mark Today, WikiLeaks Movie a Total Write Off

1

We will remember 2013 as the year of many big studio flops. Bill Condon’s “The Fifth Estate” is a $28 million write off for Disney. As of Sunday night, the Wikileaks movie had banked $2.8 million domestically.

Meantime “Gravity” will pass the $200 mil mark today in the U.S. It’s been in release for two weeks, has made a total of $365 mil worldwide. Warner Bros. can rest easy.

At Disney it’s a different story. Two more painful weeks in theaters, and “The Fifth Estate” will head to DVD and pay TV. It’s Disney’s second write off this year, following “The Lone Ranger”– a more massive loss by far. Disney’s Alan Horn can still save the year, though, with “Thor” and “Saving Mr. Banks.”

Fox is suffering, too. Ridley Scott’s “The Counselor” is a dog with $8 million for the weekend. Fox is still reeling from a total write off on Ben Affleck and Justin Timberlake on “Runner Runner.” Ouch. They have $18.8 mil domestically. At least abroad people wanted to see these actors. So the foreign take is $41 mil. Fox Searchlight hasn’t fared as well as anyone thought it would with “Enough Said.” James Gandolfini’s penultimate release, nice chemistry with Julia Louis-Dreyfus, and good reviews couldn’t lift it past $11 million. But “12 Years a Slave” is starting to boom, and will play a big deal in the Oscars.

Elsewhere, “Parkland” was totally botched by whoever released it. There was no marketing involved. “Parkland” played in Toronto, then just died. Where was the tie in to the 50th JFK anniversary? How hard could that have been? “The Inevitable Defeat of Mister and Pete” is headed in the same direction. Jennifer Hudson and Alicia Keys in a movie no one’s seen or knows anything about?  And if Roadside Attractions isn’t careful, the Robert Redford tour de force performance in “All is Lost” could go the same way. There are going to be a lot of new offerings on Netflix soon.

Daniel Craig Returns to Broadway With Springsteen and Spielberg in the Audience

1

Wow! What a night on Broadway for Harold Pinter’s “Betrayal.” Before Daniel Craig, his Oscar winning wife Rachel Weisz, and Rafe Spall could even get on the stage of the Ethel Barrymore Theater you had to check out the audience. Bruce Springsteen and Patti Scialfa sitting with Steven Spielberg and Kate Capshaw; Steven Soderbergh and wife Jules Asner with Julia Roberts and husband Danny Moder; former spouses Julie Andrews and Tony Walton; Marlo Thomas with Elaine May and Stanley Donen; Carol Kane in front of them; “Moneyball” director Bennett Miller, and Aaron Sorkin front and center, near Ellen Barkin. Bobby Cannavale with Rose Byrne, and Patricia Clarkson looking screen sirenish as usual. Also in the house: Emily Mortimer and Alessandro Nivola, plus “Skyfall” director Sam Mendes, Sir Ian McKellen, and publishing royalty Vanity Fair’s Graydon Carter and Vogue’s Anna Wintour– sitting on opposite sides of the theater.

Clearly this was not just another night on Broadway.

Mike Nichols directed this revival of “Betrayal.” The New York Times didn’t like it but everyone else did. As Elaine May, Nichols’ long time friend and partner, said to me after the show: “Who else could get laughs out of Harold Pinter?” Indeed, Nichols found the much needed humor in “Betrayal” that now gives it humanity as well as fierceness.

Producer Scott Rudin has a massive hit. I’m sure he wishes it could play past January, when the limited run ends. Premium tickets are selling for up to $500.

Craig and Weisz play a married couple, Emma and Robert. Rafe Spall plays their best friend, Jerry. His wife is unseen on stage, and Jerry– we learn instantly–has had a seven year affair with Emma. He thinks Robert hasn’t known about it. And then Pinter pulls the story off like layers of an onion. Only he does it backwards, beginning two years after the affair and working his way back to its inception. It’s short, under 100 minutes, and without an intermission.

Weisz is a proven entity, and she’s excellent as Emma. Spall is interesting choice. This production introduces him to Broadway audiences. But I think it’s Daniel Craig who’s the focus of much of the attention. Most people know him as James Bond. Four years ago he appeared in a two hander called “A Steady Rain” with Hugh Jackman.

Craig was a surprise then, and he is now. He’s extremely comfortable on stage and seems nothing like stoic Bond. When I asked him if playing Bond was a different acting muscle, he surprised me again. “No,” he said. “It’s the same. It’s all acting. I just try to be honest.” It works.