Monday, December 22, 2025
Home Blog Page 1035

“Dolittle” Does Very Little, $175 Mil Robert Downey Jr. Movie Heads to Disastrous $15 Mil Opening Weekend

0

Dr. Dolittle isn’t dead, but he’s dying fast at a local movie theater.

Receipts for Friday opening night including Thursday previews came to $6.3 million. That would indicate a $15 million three day weekend, maybe $18 million for the four day MLK weekend.

The Robert Downey Jr. film cost $175 million. This isn’t good news.

Using the Thurs-Fri combo of numbers, “Dolittle” edged out “1917” by $100,000 officially on Friday to be number 1. But really, that’s a fraud. The real “Dolittle” number for Friday was more like $5.4 million. (I am not a fan of counting Thursday previews in the Friday totals.)

Meanwhile, “1917” hit $60 million last night. For Universal, this is a gift considering they’ve got one of the worst movies ever and one of the best at the same time. As for another Universal film, “Cats,” it was last seen looking for scraps in the alley.

Elsewhere, “Just Mercy” starring Jamie Foxx and Michael B. Jordan is up to $15 million after 24 days. No promotion, no awards push, the director has been MIA for months. But it’s such a good film, try and see it in theaters.

 

 

Season 3 of “Mrs. Maisel” Ends Too Soon, But It’s Probably the Best Written, Directed, Choreographed and Acted TV Show Right Now

0

There are only eight episodes of the third season of “The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel.” I sort of knew this going in, but when episode 8 is stampeding toward its conclusion– with a re-enacting riff on “Casablanca”– the reality sinks in. Suddenly, you’re like Whoa, what? We were just getting started.

Amy Sherman Palladino and Daniel Palladino really set the standard in season 3 for set pieces, choreographed and directed. They invented a character based on Johnny Mathis, a closeted African American pop singer who makes the ladies swoon. Shy Baldwin is his name, and he takes Midge “Mrs. Maisel” on tour, giving her a taste of stardom. The Palladinos really worked hard on Shy Baldwin. His casting takes two actors, original songs, and a girls’ back up group a la the Shirelles. It’s also completely authentic.

Season 3 dazzles, and you do wonder how much money they spent on these shows. The 8 episodes are like 8 movies. But whatever they spent, it’s all up there on the screen. Just as the Catskills and Paris resonated in the 2nd season, Midge’s and Shy’s gigs in Las Vegas and Miami are lush and memorable. One of the great, inspired moments is Midge and Lenny Bruce (Luke Kirby, still killing it) appearing on a closed circuit TV show called “Miami After Dark” with a Hugh Hefner type host.

There are a lot of guest stars and cameos in this season. Jane Lynch figures prominently as Sophie Lennox, the crass comedienne who wants to star on Broadway in “Miss Julie.” Sterling K. Brown appears as Shy’s manager. Jason Alexander makes the most surprising turn, as a former playwright turned recluse who figures in Abe’s (Tony Shalhoub’s) pivot from math professor to theater critic. (You’ll see.) By episode 7, the stage is full of characters, almost too many, which shows how much the Palladino’s have created Midge’s extended world. What a gang!

But it’s the core group that pulls this show along, they are by far the best ensemble on TV or maybe anywhere. From Midge (the glowing, buoyant, unruffled Rachel Brosnahan) and Susie (Alex Borstein, channeling spirits) to Joel, his parents, Midge’s parents, Zelda the maid, the effervescent Mrs. Moskowitz, and so on there is never a false note. This season, the Weissmans lose their Columbia University-owned six bedroom apartment on the UWS and are invited to stay with the Maisels in their palatial Forest Hills home. Talk about clashing cultures. The Weissmans are phony snobs. The Maisels are unbridled, the Costanzas with money.

We must stop here to mention that the nature of Rose Weissman’s (Marin Hinkle) family wealth is finally revealed: Oklahoma oil wells, drilled by her grandmother. (Yes, they are Jewish immigrants from Russia.) This entire episode is so bizarre and hilarious, it’s some kind of Mel Brooks psychedelic kaleidoscope filtered through Mad magazine. It also gives Hinkle an episode in which she shines like crazy.

Scenes are stolen and scenery chewed by all the main players and even some supporting ones. When Susie’s sister Tess explains how their mother died, I don’t know how actress kept a straight face. (You also realize later her character’s name is Tess Meyerson, which I don’t think is a coincidence.) And how about Wally Shawn locked in a windowless room in Sophie’s house, writing her jokes? And Kevin Pollack, as Moishe Maisel, sending up “Downton Abbey” (what is a weekend?), or Caroline Aaron as his wife, Shirley, as an injection of Woody Allen-esque humor? And there’s always Midge’s shiksa sister- in-law who is constantly muttering Yiddish and reeling off her vast knowledge of Judaism. (I adore her.)

So where are episodes 9 and 10? I do feel we were short changed. Season 3 is perfect, but stops too short. Maybe they just ran out of money (the dresses look like they cost a million bucks, some have already gone to the Smithsonian). But this is what will keep us coming back, these cliffhangers, and episodes full of detail and ornamentation that read like ancient tapestries. “Mrs. Maisel” is a dessert cart of many sophisticated flavors. We will always want more.

Oscars Best Picture Race: “Little Women” Director Greta Gerwig Did Q&A’s with a Fever, Now the Film Crosses $80 Million Line

0
Greta Gerwig was under the weather at the end of the year, just two weeks ago. Her beautiful face had a feverish glow — but she still managed to show up for a screening of her new film “Little Women” and participate in  Q&A afterwards at the NYIT Theater on the Upper West Side. Gerwig wrote and directed her version of Louisa May Alcott’s literary saga of the beloved March sisters in a retelling that is true to its 19th-century origins and uniquely modern to our times.
Starring Saoirse Ronan, Florence Pugh, Timothee Chalamet, Emma Watson and Laura Dern, “Little Women” has received rave reviews from critics and is connecting with audience in a big way. At the time of the Q&A, the movie was new and no one knew how it would do at the box office. This weekend, it crosses the $80 mil mark, an extraordinary achievement.
After the screening, Gerwig, despite being sick — she said she was coming down with a fever and beads of sweat could be seen on her lip — engaged in a lively discussion with the enthusiastic audience.
She said of the importance of the book, “I always felt that you could draw somewhat of a straight line between Louisa May Alcott doing what she did and writing the book she wrote, writing about the lives of girls and women. And then, what I’ve been able to do. So for me, that last moment (in the film) where Saoirse as Louisa/Jo is holding her book and looks up. To me that’s her looking, she sees the future.
“And, I think when I look at the 20th century and the number of women who said that that book meant something to them and it meant something to them and it made them write and it made them do, whether it was Simone de Beauvoir or Elena Ferrante or Patty Smith or J K Rowling,”
Gerwig mentioned the community of inspiration around the book, that she came back to the book multiple times as an adult at different life stages.
“I actually read it again and again when I was a kid and then I guess the last time I read it was 14 or something and then I read it when I was 30 and I felt like I’d never read it before,” she told the audience, adding, “ I felt like I couldn’t believe how modern and pressing and urgent the message of the book was. And there seemed to be all these themes running underneath it that were right there, about authorship and ownership and women and art and ambition and money and I thought, ‘This is all this stuff I’m interested in.’”
In discussing the challenges of how far to contemporize elements in the film, Gerwig was asked about where she wanted to insert a little Greta Gerwigness to it or not.
“Actually I would say something like 90% of the dialogue is either directly word for word from the book or from a letter or a journal that Louisa May Alcott had written or another piece of text that she’d written. If there’s a Greta Gerwigness in it, I would say it’s been the speed of delivery more than anything else. I actually think you’d be surprised. Most of the lines are, actually even some lines that you don’t think are in the book and which is the reason I wanted to make the movie is, like Marmee’s line, ‘I’m angry almost every single day of my life.’ That’s from the book. When I reread it, I underlined it and I wrote beside it. ‘Marmee’s been angry for a hundred and fifty years?’ But I think it was more about pulling things out of the book that I felt hadn’t really been explored fully. And then also speeding it all up, because to me part of the pleasure was taking these lines that had been embroidered on pillows and having them raced through.”
Photo courtesy of Brad Balfour

Thursday Box Office Previews: Will Smith Scores Big Time Comeback, Robert Downey Jr. “Dolittle” Bombs with Less than $1 Mil

0

It’s good news and bad for two box office stars this weekend.

Last night’s preview numbers for “Bad Boys for Life” and “Dolittle” tell very sharply contrasting stories.

Will Smith and Martin Lawrence haven’t been on screen together for 16 years. But the third “Bad Boys” movie raked in a huge $6.3 million in previews last night.  They’re looking at a possible $50 mil MLK weekend. Sony Pictures has a nice sized hit on their hands.

But “Dolittle” did nothing on Thursday, just $950,000. The reviews are worse than terrible, the outlook for Robert Downey Jr. and his furry friends is miserable. The people most affronted will be passengers at the American Airlines terminal at JFK. The place is covered in ads for “Dolittle.” What I really found weird was that the character posters all had Downey on them, not the name actors who voice the animals. “Dolittle” will be a total write off of $175 million after this weekend’s quick open and close.

Some good news: “Little Women ” is headed to $80 million tonight.

Grammy Turmoil UPDATED: Ousted CEO Deborah Dugan Dug Her Own Grave, Refusing to Be Political or Diplomatic

0

Ousted NARAS/Grammy CEO Deborah Dugan dug her own grave. She arrived with good intentions, but she ultimately her own worst enemy.

Problems began last spring, right after she was hired. Dugan refused to get on a plane and come west for the taping of the Grammy Special Merit/Lifetime Achievement concert at the Dolby Theater. Even though this was outgoing CEO Neil Portnow’s event for the Grammys, Dugan surprised the artists and guests by having no interest in the proceedings. That was the beginning of trouble. Acts like Black Sabbath, Sam Moore, Valerie Simpson, Dionne Warwick, Julio Iglesias, and veteran producer Lou Adler were involved. Everyone at the event asked, Where is the new CEO? The answer was, no one knew.

Portnow was successful at the job for almost 20 years based on one simple lesson: showing up is 90% of the job. Neil made sure he spoke at every minor Grammy related event. He was the music business’s representative. He knew everyone, and met anyone he didn’t. Last fall, I continually asked my sources in the business, What is Deborah Dugan like? No one knew. She’d made no effort to win over people in the business who mattered. This was shocking.

Sources tell me now that Dugan deeply offended the Recording Academy staff. She was particularly brutal to Portnow’s former assistant, who’d been with the Academy since before Neil’s reign. Dugan also set her sights on taking down some of the entrenched NARAS dealmakers, who’d formed decades of alliances with each other. She can threaten (as she has through her lawyer this morning in the New York Times) to “expose” bad practices or whatever, but no one cares.

There was a throwaway line in Billboard’s story this morning, that Dugan hadn’t planned on speaking during the Grammy broadcast. I think that crystallizes the whole situation. Portnow always addressed the TV audience. He created a community. That Dugan was planning to remain invisible speaks to her lack of savvy about how to run this organization.

Turmoil at the Grammy Awards as CEO Deborah Dugan Is Ousted After Six Months, A Week Before Show

0

Turmoil at the Grammys and the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences: they’ve ousted new CEO Deborah Dugan, who began work on August 1, 2019.

The LA Times reports there’s an investigation after a female member of the board sounded an alarm about Dugan’s inappropriate behavior.

The Grammys are a week from Sunday. In Dugan’s place will step Harvey Mason, Jr., who’s a long time producer and musician. He’s an executive producer of the upcoming Aretha Franklin movie.

“In light of concerns raised to the Recording Academy Board of Trustees, including a formal allegation of misconduct by a senior female member of the Recording Academy team, the Board has placed Recording Academy President and CEO Deborah Dugan on administrative leave, effective immediately,” according to a statement from the academy provided to The Times. “The Board has also retained two independent third-party investigators to conduct independent investigations of the allegations.”

The Times says Dugan didn’t fit in and I concur. By the end of the year almost no one in the record business had met her or had any idea what was going on in the NARAS offices. In late December I asked to meet her and she agreed. But last week when I tried to see her, she sent an email that just read: “Impossible!”

Dugan’s predecessor, Neil Portnow, ran NARAS for 20 years calmly and coolly. He was admired and respected and handled the job with real elegance. His one mistake was an off hand comment that female musicians should “step up” when he was criticized two years ago for not having enough female representation at the Grammys. This was right after the #Metoo scandals broke, and everyone was acting crazy. They should have left Neil alone. It’s not the NARAS CEO’s mandate to bring in female musicians.

What’s next? Maybe whatever was obviously going sour at NARAS will be righted. It all to be fixed ASAP.

Real Life Brothers of Marvelous “Mr. Maisel” Want to Build a 244 Foot Tall, 21 Story Skyscraper in Greenwich Village

EXCLUSIVE Guess who wants to build a 244 foot tall, 21 story skyscraper in the middle of landmarked Greenwich Village? Why, the real life brothers of The Marvelous “Mister Maisel,” Josh and Marc Zegen.

The Zegens own a real estate development company called Madison Realty Capital. They’ve applied to the Landmarks Commission to demolish two small historic structures at Fifth Avenue and 8th St. and replace them with a luxury tower. The Zegens bought the buildings a couple of years ago and emptied the affordable rental apartments. They would be replaced with apartments for billionaires.

This might not amuse Joel Maisel, whom their brother, Michael Zegen, plays on the Amazon TV series. It would definitely raise the ire of Joel’s TV wife, Midge (Rachel Brosnahan), and her father, Abe Weissman (Tony Shalhoub). “The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel” celebrates New York and the Village, especially.

Tomorrow, Friday, at 11:30am there will be a rally in front of the buildings to stop the Zegens. Borough President Gale Brewer, City Council Speaker Corey Johnson, State Senator Brad Hoylman, Assemblymember Deborah Glick, Historic Districts Council, and Village Independent Democrats will be out in force. Lenny Bruce’s spirit may be invoked if things get heated.

The Zegens — according to a release — want to “demolish this 20-unit 1848 building located in the Greenwich Village Historic District and replace it with an 18-unit high-rise –four times the height of the existing building, but with less housing! The existing building had at least ten units of affordable rent-stabilized housing, to be replaced by super-luxury units which will no doubt not serve as a primary residence to a single person. The proposed building is 75% taller than the average building on lower Fifth Avenue in the Greenwich Village Historic District and FOUR TIMES the height of the average building on its block. Because it’s located in the Greenwich Village Historic District, the building can ONLY be demolished and replaced if they convince the NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission that14-16 Fifth Avenue hasno historic or architectural significance, and the proposed replacement tower is “appropriate” for the site and the historic district.Village Preservation has complied significant documentation of the historic significance of the building.”

Mariah Carey Gets into the Songwriters Hall of Fame Despite Plagiarism Claims, Others Include Pharrell, Steve Miller, Eurythmics, The Isley Bros.

0

The 2020 Songwriters Hall of Fame inductees have been announced. Mariah Carey, who’s never written a song by herself and was accused of plagiarism many times– and settled many lawsuits– is in. None of her collaborators are in– not Walter Afanasieff, who wrote “All I Want for Christmas” or Ben Margulies, who penned “Vision of Love.” None of ’em.

Mariah has made it into the SHOF before Pete Townshend and Roger Daltrey.

Other inductees this year include Motown great Mickey Stevenson, Steve Miller, Annie Lennox and Dave Stewart, The Isley Brothers, and Pharrell William and Chad Hugo. I’m looking forward to the interview in which Mariah explains her process of songwriting alongside these others.

Mariah’s fans will inundate me today with Tweets and messages. They’re already writing in. But the facts are the facts. Many of her songs were sampled from other hits, including “Fantasy,” and “Emotions.” You can read all about it here. There were settlements for $1 million. And read about it here.

This doesn’t take away from Mariah’s voice, or her personality. But really, the Songwriters Hall of Fame has done itself a disservice. The fans who write to me and say Margulies or Afanasieff “only wrote” some songs are discounting the fact that those were the hits, and they don’t come anymore.

Mariah has no songs that she’s “written” by herself. Some of the songs– like “We Belong Together” — has a roll call of writers longer than a grocery list, including the late Bobby Womack who was sampled: Jermaine Dupri, Manuel Seal, Johntá Austin, Kenneth Edmonds, Darnell Bristol, Bobby Womack, Patrick Moten, Sandra Sully. Except for Bobby, will they all take the stage?

Mariah’s not the only problem for the SHOF. Pharrell, good as he is, has the spectre of “Blurred Lines” hanging over him. Marvin Gaye’s family may have a few things to say about his induction.

UPDATE “Dolittle” — $175 Million — Lower than “Cats” with a ’13’: Robert Downey Jr.’s Rare Non-Avengers Movie in Last Decade Drubbed by Critics

0

THURSDAY MORNING: “Dolittle” now has a 13 on Rotten Tomatoes. Compare that to a 20 for “Cats.” Yikes!

WEDNESDAY Someone call a vet! Universal Pictures and animals simply don’t mix. The studio that just gave us the much derided bomb, “Cats,” is about to die another day with “Dolittle.” The movie cost $175 million and may not make $20 million this weekend!

The remake of “Dr. Dolittle” stars Robert Downey, Jr in one of his rare non-“Avengers” movie in a decade. The former Oscar nominee for “Chaplin” should be making great serious films now, not this fluff. (He’s capable of winning an Oscar with the right material.)

A load of celebrities including his “Spider Man” protege Tom Holland voice various animals in the new movie. But it doesn’t help. Every review is a pan, or worse. So far the movie has a 17 on Rotten Tomatoes, and it’s sinking.

One problem is that Downey for some reason speaks in a Welsh accent, something approaching it. Reviews note that the film had to be re-recorded to fix his accent, and that the result is a mouth moving out of sync.

“Superficial charm can’t save a film with poor characterization as well as a bizarre and ultimately disappointing lead performance,” reads one blog called Culture Vulture.
Slant: #Dolittle‘s inability to completely develop any of its characters reduces the film to all pomp and no circumstance.” 
Another blogger: “Just when I thought Dolittle couldn’t get any less funny or idiotic, Robert Downey Jr. sticks his arms up a dragon’s a—–e. And I do mean that literally.”
Universal can still hold its head high. Sam Mendes’ “1917” may win the Oscar for Best Picture. You have good days and bad.

Elton John’s Dilemma: He Appoints Four Hosts for Oscar Party Since He’s an Academy Award Nominee for First Time in 25 Years

0

Elton John has a dilemma. Every year he and David Furnish host their Oscar dinner and party in West Hollywood for their Elton John AIDS Foundation. The evening is the hot ticket with dozens and dozens of celebrities attending.

But there’s a problem this year for the first time in 25 years: Elton is an Oscar nominee himself. He and Furnish will be at the Dolby Theater where Elton is nominated for Best Song for “I’m Gonna Love Me Again” from his biopic, “Rocketman.” What to do?

A little history: In 1995, Elton and Tim Rice had an astounding 3 of the 5 Best Song nominations from “The Lion King.” They won for “Can You Feel the Love Tonight?” They were also cited for “Hakuna Matata” and “The Circle of Life.”

Wait– hello? Can you imagine that? Three of the five nominated songs were theirs. Frankly, Elton and Bernie deserved a nod this year for “Never Too Late” from the new “Lion King.”

David and Elton  appointed four hosts to watch over the party while they’re preoccupied. The hosts are Diane Lane, Eric McCormack. Heidi Klum, and, of course, Billy Porter. They’ll be helped out by the “Queer Eye” hosts Bobby Berk, Tan France, Karamo, and Jonathan van Ness. There will be a musical performance, as well, by up-and-comer Sam Fender. My old pal, Dave Karger, and Aisha Tyler will host the live stream.

Should Sir Elton win Best Song, and it’s a good bet, there will be post-Oscar mayhem. His famed lyricist Bernie Taupin, will be on hand, and so, too, I think will be Golden Globe winning actor Taron Egerton who played Elton in “Rocketman.” The EJAF dinner and viewing party will have something the other after parties won’t: an actual Oscar winner as host.

 

with additional reporting by Leah Sydney