Florian Zeller’s The Father with Anthony Hopkins and Olivia Colman was so clever and well constructed, full of surprises, you had to admire it. Sir Anthony won the Oscar, which was exactly right. The whole movie was a gem.

So what does Zeller follow it up with but “The Son.” All the originality is gone. It’s “Ordinary People” without a purpose or hope. The acting is professional tidy, with Laura Dern stealing whatever there is to be taken. Hugh Jackman is somber (although he shines during an inspired dance moment). But yikes, want to feel bad? “The Son” is for you.

So Hugh is a high powered Manhattan lawyer who left his wife (Dern) and their teen son for a younger woman. The new couple has a new a baby. But back in Brooklyn, Dern is dealing with the morose, severely depressed son (Zen McGrath) who is clearly going to kill either himself or someone else before this thing comes to an end.

Zeller depicts the parents as clueless, as if they’ve never seen “Ordinary People” or read about all the incels who’ve shot up schools, etc. Jackman and Dern’s divorced parents don’t seem to have any connection to the real world and make all the wrong choices despite their education, wealth, and living in the most sophisticated city in the world. Only Kirby as the second wife senses the danger they’re all in, but no one will listen to her.

This movie season is just full of good acting in well made films that don’t make sense. I don’t know why. I’ve said this before: no one seems to think them through. “The Son” has no arc. It’s just a set up for disaster than ends in disaster. They should have followed the arc of the bombing raid in “Top Gun Maverick.” You fly into the steep valley, get close to the ground, release your bombs, and the climb out quickly. In this case, they just fly in, drop the bombs, and then crash into the mountain.

Dern just knows how to play a conflicted mother in pain with subtlety and grace. If you follow her, the film is torture. Jackman brings the gravity but he can’t find his way out of this mess. Newcomer Zen McGrath, who’s Australian, makes an appealing debut despite struggling with an American accent, and Kirby is a fresh addition to an old formula.

But “The Son” is not “The Father,” even with a cameo from Hopkins as Jackman’s cold-hearted father (a much different character from the first movie). Let’s hope there is no third chapter.

“Avatar 2” just finished its first press screenings today and the verdict is in. People like it!

James Cameron may have a “titanic” hit on his hands. Most everyone who’s checked in on social media says the sequel, some 13 years after the original, is better than the first one.

The movie is entirely animated and in stunning 3D. There’s a lot of blue and a lot of water, Sigourney Weaver plays a 14 year old. (In real life, she’s 21.)

Actual reviews won’t come out til next week, but social media “impressions” are allowed now. The consensus is that the movie is “visually stunning” if so far the story itself is not getting the same glowing reactions. The movie is three hours long.

Many Twitter observations run along the lines of “Never bet against James Cameron.” Indeed. He knows how to make a spectacle!

Critic and blogger Ed Douglas writes: “Like the OG Avatar, #AvatarTheWayOfWater takes some time to really get rolling, and though it hits a few lulls, it looks glorious with next level visual FX, and ultimately, I will see it again without hesitation. Lots of new younger characters in this one.”

Oscar debate now commences. Certainly Best Animated Film and all the below the line categories will be flooded with names from this film.