Thursday, March 28, 2024

Tom Cruise Wants More Money for “Mission Impossible 6” Because His Other Films Are Not Big Hits

Share

We all liked Tom Cruise in “Edge of Tomorrow,” or at least, we liked the movie. It made just $100 million, and that required leaving it in theaters well past its expiration date.

“Oblivion,” which preceded “Edge,” made just under $90 million.

“Jack Reacher”– $80 million.

“Rock of Ages”– $38.5 million

In fact, you have to go all the way back to 2005 and “War of the Worlds” to find a Tom Cruise movie other than “Mission: Impossible” that’s been an out and out hit– “War” did $250 million.

And that’s why Tom Cruise wants more money for “Mission: Impossible 6.” Reports are that ‘soft’ lead up production was halted on “MI 6” this week because Cruise is still in negotiations. His agents are looking for bigger cuts of all the action. The reason is, “Mission Impossible” has become Cruise’s main stem income, just as “Pirates of the Caribbean” has for Johnny Depp.

They are actors who will one day (when we are old) get Lifetime Achievement Oscars. But right now, they are aging, and their expenses are going up while receipts are going down. Cruise doesn’t have a lot of years left for hanging off planes or repelling along the world’s tallest buildings, no matter what trainer he hires.

And then there’s the matter of living a very high life. As Michael Jackson learned the hard way, carrying lots of people, staff, family, flying on private planes, etc– it costs a lot, even if the studio pays for it. On top of that, no one really has any idea how much Cruise has devoted to Scientology. We can assume it’s a lot.

Meanwhile, Paramount has to be tense over dealing with Cruise. Not only is he a financial liability in some ways, but the studio has a lot of issues this year. Setting aside the whole Sumner Redstone saga, Paramount has had only one $100 million hit so far in 2016– “Star Trek Beyond” at $135 million, and it’s a money loser. “Beyond” cost at least $185 million, and worldwide has brought in just $215 million. Not good.

Of course, they do have Tom Cruise in “Jack Reacher 2,” but sequels traditionally do less well than the original films. “Jack Reacher” was not a big hit, so who knows?  Paramount is counting on a late 2016 for its hits–Martin Scorsese’s “Silence” and Denzel Washington’s “Fences” should be substantial successes, and bring in Academy Awards. But they’ve got to be eyeing “MI:6” with a wary wallet.

Roger Friedman
Roger Friedmanhttps://www.showbiz411.com
Roger Friedman began his Showbiz411 column in April 2009 after 10 years with Fox News, where he created the Fox411 column. His movie reviews are carried by Rotten Tomatoes, and he is a member of both the movie and TV branches of the Critics Choice Awards. His articles have appeared in dozens of publications over the years including New York Magazine, where he wrote the Intelligencer column in the mid 90s and covered the OJ Simpson trial, and Fox News (when it wasn't so crazy) where he covered Michael Jackson. He is also the writer and co-producer of "Only the Strong Survive," a selection of the Cannes, Sundance, and Telluride Film festivals, directed by DA Pennebaker and Chris Hegedus.
spot_img

Read more

In Other News