Home Uncategorized Woody Allen’s Side Fires Back: “Disgraceful and Untrue”

Woody Allen’s side fires back! His press agent Leslee Dart sent out this statement.

“Mr. Allen has read the article and found it untrue and disgraceful. He will be responding very soon.

At the time, a thorough investigation was conducted by court appointed independent experts. The experts concluded there was no credible evidence of molestation; that Dylan Farrow had an inability to distinguish between fantasy and reality; and that Dylan Farrow had likely been coached by her mother Mia Farrow. No charges were ever filed.”

Me? I’m amazed the press just picked this up as if Dylan Farrow were telling the truth unquestionably. We’ve already seen that Ronan Farrow is totally manipulated by his mother. Mia Farrow has maintained a hot burning revenge against Woody Allen for 22 years.

And the New York Times: they let Dylan Farrow’s letter run in a blog, not in the paper. The letter ran with no attempt to contact Allen. It was an ambush. Read my prior item about Nicholas Kristof’s relationship to Mia Farrow. The Times should be ashamed that they let Kristof do this.

Share and Enjoy !

Roger Friedman began his Showbiz411 column in April 2009 after 10 years with Fox News, where he created the Fox411 column. His movie reviews are carried by Rotten Tomatoes, and he is a member of both the movie and TV branches of the Critics Choice Awards. His articles have appeared in dozens of publications over the years including New York Magazine, where he wrote the Intelligencer column in the mid 90s and covered the OJ Simpson trial, and Fox News (when it wasn't so crazy) where he covered Michael Jackson. He is also the writer and co-producer of "Only the Strong Survive," a selection of the Cannes, Sundance, and Telluride Film festivals, directed by DA Pennebaker and Chris Hegedus.
2 replies to this post
  1. Robert Friedman: You are a now shill and propgandist for a pedophile? You don’t even have the logic and reason to see your own circular logic? You are shilling for the predator while subltley condemning a NYT journalist for only allowing (simply allowing) victim to say her piece. You are left with impotent arguments: 1. question the timing 2. question the reporter who simply has the blog.

    The timing is quite clear: the victim is fed up with the public adoration of a predator. That needs no justification. The victim had no say in the timing of her victimization. Secondly, who cares which blog it appeared on? Relevenance!!???

    I know your life is focused on the trite and the trivialities of entertainment, but you need to be marginalized as the shill and pathtetic creature you are becoming. Stick with the trivial banalities of your trite reporting.

    (There is no conspiracy here. I am just a random pedestrian who knows a shill when he sees one.)

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.