Comments on: First Review: “Les Miserables” Comes to Movies with Hugh Jackman, Russell Crowe, Anne Hathaway http://www.showbiz411.com/2012/11/23/first-review-les-miserables-comes-to-movies-with-hugh-jackman-russell-crowe-anne-hathaway?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=first-review-les-miserables-comes-to-movies-with-hugh-jackman-russell-crowe-anne-hathaway Exclusive Hollywood News in Movies, Music, Broadway and Celebrity Headlines Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:45:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Kanema http://www.showbiz411.com/2012/11/23/first-review-les-miserables-comes-to-movies-with-hugh-jackman-russell-crowe-anne-hathaway/comment-page-2#comment-145989 Kanema Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:11:33 +0000 http://www.showbiz411.com/?p=26752#comment-145989 the miserables, musical created in France, written and composed by the French, but that of course! is not at all mentioned in the article or in the comments; give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar please

]]>
By: Elizabeth Burns http://www.showbiz411.com/2012/11/23/first-review-les-miserables-comes-to-movies-with-hugh-jackman-russell-crowe-anne-hathaway/comment-page-2#comment-143209 Elizabeth Burns Sat, 08 Dec 2012 22:50:38 +0000 http://www.showbiz411.com/?p=26752#comment-143209 Loved it……Saw the play many many years ago and this was just as good in a different way. Thought the cast was incredible….especially Hugh Jackman. And yes, I saw Lincoln but think this could be Hugh’s time!

]]>
By: Roger Friedman http://www.showbiz411.com/2012/11/23/first-review-les-miserables-comes-to-movies-with-hugh-jackman-russell-crowe-anne-hathaway/comment-page-2#comment-140548 Roger Friedman Wed, 28 Nov 2012 22:37:29 +0000 http://www.showbiz411.com/?p=26752#comment-140548 not really. that’s young anyway. the movie is long. i’d say 12 and above.

]]>
By: Linda Johnson http://www.showbiz411.com/2012/11/23/first-review-les-miserables-comes-to-movies-with-hugh-jackman-russell-crowe-anne-hathaway/comment-page-2#comment-140546 Linda Johnson Wed, 28 Nov 2012 22:17:10 +0000 http://www.showbiz411.com/?p=26752#comment-140546 Will it be appropriate for an 8 year old child? I’m wondering how violent and sexual it is.

]]>
By: GO RUSS, GO! http://www.showbiz411.com/2012/11/23/first-review-les-miserables-comes-to-movies-with-hugh-jackman-russell-crowe-anne-hathaway/comment-page-2#comment-140363 GO RUSS, GO! Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:53:47 +0000 http://www.showbiz411.com/?p=26752#comment-140363 [...] at Showbiz 411, Roger Friedman [...]

]]>
By: PATR http://www.showbiz411.com/2012/11/23/first-review-les-miserables-comes-to-movies-with-hugh-jackman-russell-crowe-anne-hathaway/comment-page-2#comment-140283 PATR Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:39:22 +0000 http://www.showbiz411.com/?p=26752#comment-140283 1776 WAS ABOUT THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION and face it would b critics the american musical is the only real contribution to the legitimate art world so quit knocking it (yes i know les miz is not american but it still epitomizes our only legitimate world contribution to culture)

]]>
By: Elivan http://www.showbiz411.com/2012/11/23/first-review-les-miserables-comes-to-movies-with-hugh-jackman-russell-crowe-anne-hathaway/comment-page-2#comment-140062 Elivan Tue, 27 Nov 2012 01:06:20 +0000 http://www.showbiz411.com/?p=26752#comment-140062 Another Les Mis? Pfffff

]]>
By: jodie http://www.showbiz411.com/2012/11/23/first-review-les-miserables-comes-to-movies-with-hugh-jackman-russell-crowe-anne-hathaway/comment-page-2#comment-139553 jodie Mon, 26 Nov 2012 03:52:24 +0000 http://www.showbiz411.com/?p=26752#comment-139553 yes…the musical sweeney todd predates the musical of les miserables…but the original french version…I believe it was called 1776..or some other date…was pre- sweeney todd…it may even have only been a concert version ,or concept album…..I remember seeing the bootleg in high school from Paris…1978?…maybe earlier…???

]]>
By: Thomas http://www.showbiz411.com/2012/11/23/first-review-les-miserables-comes-to-movies-with-hugh-jackman-russell-crowe-anne-hathaway/comment-page-2#comment-139477 Thomas Sun, 25 Nov 2012 22:06:32 +0000 http://www.showbiz411.com/?p=26752#comment-139477 @Aj – You’re probably not worth arguing with, but why exactly do you condemn this as trash? Because it’s a musical? You do realize that some of the greatest works of art of the last century were musicals, right?

As for the insults – they say much more about you than they do about anyone who is looking forward to this movie.

@Bob Lee – It seems you only know of one kind of musical – the all-singing, all-dancing, all-cheerful Astaire & Rogers/Busby Berkeley kind. That kind is often great, but there are other, more serious kinds that are just as great.

To put it another way, musicals aren’t just fluffy entertainment. They can tackle complex subjects and have surprising emotional depth.

Example: “Sweeney Todd” is one of the greatest musicals ever written – and one of the greatest works of art of the twentieth century – and it’s about a barber who kills his clients and bakes them into pies. It’s a tragic (though often darkly comedic) work that features one of the best and most complex scores and some of the best lyrics ever written for a musical.

Another example: “Parade.” The story of the real life lynching of a Jewish man who was framed for the rape and murder of a child. And a great musical – one that in no way trivializes the events it depicts.

Yet another example: “Les Miserables.” It’s not a celebration of any revolution, nor does it trivialize the bloodshed. Rather, it’s a story of forgiveness and redemption and the bloody cost of revolution. It also features an incredible score.

Also, you’re thinking of the wrong revolution.

Also, you don’t know what irony is.

Also, it really is best to know what you’re talking about before you start talking.

]]>
By: Roger Friedman http://www.showbiz411.com/2012/11/23/first-review-les-miserables-comes-to-movies-with-hugh-jackman-russell-crowe-anne-hathaway/comment-page-2#comment-139450 Roger Friedman Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:31:15 +0000 http://www.showbiz411.com/?p=26752#comment-139450 The director and cast, who were present. You obviously didn’t read the whole piece.

]]>