Home Uncategorized The New Yorker Endorses President Obama for Re-election

Endorsements are coming in from various newspapers and magazines for the presidential race. Now The New Yorker weighs in for President Obama’s re-election. It wasn’t a given by any means. I don’t think any endorsement is certain in this election.

I think they describe the president pretty well: “Obama is also a human being, a flawed and complicated one, and as the world has come to know him better we have sometimes seen the downside of his temperament: a certain insularity and self-satisfaction; a tendency at times—as in the first debate with Mitt Romney—to betray disdain for the unpleasant tasks of politics.”

Of Mitt Romney they write: “…what is most disquieting is Romney’s larger political vision. When he said that Obama “takes his political inspiration from Europe, and from the socialist democrats in Europe,” he was not only signalling Obama’s “otherness” to one kind of conservative voter; he was suggesting that Obama’s liberalism is in conflict with a uniquely American strain of individualism.”

The New Yorker editorial ends like this:

“The choice is clear. The Romney-Ryan ticket represents a constricted and backward-looking vision of America: the privatization of the public good. In contrast, the sort of public investment championed by Obama—and exemplified by both the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and the Affordable Care Act—takes to heart the old civil-rights motto “Lifting as we climb.” That effort cannot, by itself, reverse the rise of inequality that has been under way for at least three decades. But we’ve already seen the future that Romney represents, and it doesn’t work.

“The reëlection of Barack Obama is a matter of great urgency. Not only are we in broad agreement with his policy directions; we also see in him what is absent in Mitt Romney—a first-rate political temperament and a deep sense of fairness and integrity. A two-term Obama Administration will leave an enduringly positive imprint on political life. It will bolster the ideal of good governance and a social vision that tempers individualism with a concern for community. Every Presidential election involves a contest over the idea of America. Obama’s America—one that progresses, however falteringly, toward social justice, tolerance, and equality—represents the future that this country deserves.”

1 reply to this post
  1. I’m having an argument with someone. I claimed that the New Yorker has only ever endorsed Democrats. All I can find evidence of is their prior endorsement of Kerry and Obama. He claims they endorsed numerous Republican candidates for mayor and governor. you seen any evidence of that?

Leave a Reply

Print This Post Print This Post