Comments on: Exclusive: Katie Holmes Fires Publicist, Returns to Pre- Tom Cruise Agency

By: sdot

sdot — Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:32:39 +0000

All the evidence outlined in this article does lead to KH being mind effed into being with TC. Those Scientology pple are nuts. I think most religions are a little crazy and want to control pple but Scientology takes it to another level. DEF a cult!

By: Noni

Noni — Mon, 02 Jul 2012 12:08:51 +0000

Boy, talk about a slant to writing…and, sorry, but I don’t think the world of acting was every KH’s oyster. She was a TV star in hit series ten years ago. Her marriage to TC made her much more high profile and able to pick projects to which she otherwise would not have had access. Think probably at the beginning she was in love. Now, she will be the rich ex-wife who can pretty much do as she wants. TC may have had a plan for her but she may have had a plan for TC, too. KH not the naive, mid-controlled waif presented in this very subjective piece.

By: Jers

Jers — Mon, 02 Jul 2012 11:56:08 +0000

Big difference here is that Scientology is a cult NOT a religion.

By: Andrew

Andrew — Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:43:43 +0000

@spike Nice try, but people will draw their own (obvious) conclusions here based on the facts, not your generalities. Trying to give scientology credibility by associating it with people with “religious beliefs” is weak. This is all about saving Suri from being raised as a scientologist. Either you’re a scientologist yourself or you’re not very perceptive or plain dumb.

By: Rachel

Rachel — Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:37:44 +0000

Spike, Scientology isn’t a religion, it’s a cult.

By: e

Sun, 01 Jul 2012 18:15:14 +0000

Of course Spike your assuming that one considers Scientology an actual religion, and not a money-grubbing cult that separates gullible people from their money.

By: James

James — Sun, 01 Jul 2012 15:03:02 +0000

A Classic Dominator relationship (read The Freedom Programme), she’s best rid of that psychotic snake-in-a-suit, also read “The Psycopath Test” and “Snakes In Suits”

By: Enrique

Enrique — Sun, 01 Jul 2012 10:02:11 +0000

Spike,
Unfair. It’s a legitimate question. You infer from the article the author is interested in their “religious beliefs.” I infer he is interested in level of control Katie’s “Scientology minders” may or may not have tried to exert over her. That is quite distinct from belief. The author is suggesting the problem is the controlling aspect of the organization rather than the religion of the church. This is not bigotry. A cooler rereading of the article may assuage your concerns. Unless you are overly sensitive to the issues of control he raises, too.

By: belkin

belkin — Sun, 01 Jul 2012 08:23:33 +0000

Sure Spike, you must be right – she’s no longer willing to fake being in love with a gay man anymore as a husband … maybe he goes to the same massage spas as other gay Scientologists … or is that where members meet? Nothing wrong with it or is it?

By: Spike

Spike — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 20:29:39 +0000

You’re blowing this out of all proportion and trying to link their relationship to Scientology somehow because of some bigoted hidden agenda. People’s romantic get-togethers, as well as their breakups, stem from motivations of all kinds, completely unrelated to their religious beliefs. Here’s a simple test: When a couple with mainstream religious beliefs breaks up, do you take a magnifying glass to how their religious beliefs, either same or divergent, might have caused difficulties in their marriage. No? Then, just admit it, you’re just masking your religious bigotry in this article.